{"id":3105,"date":"2021-02-17T08:18:50","date_gmt":"2021-02-17T08:18:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/thenextweb.com\/?p=1339272"},"modified":"2021-02-17T08:18:50","modified_gmt":"2021-02-17T08:18:50","slug":"focal-radiance-review-the-literal-bentley-of-headphones-sounds-fantastic","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.londonchiropracter.com\/?p=3105","title":{"rendered":"Focal Radiance review: The literal Bentley of headphones sounds fantastic"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>The <a href=\"https:\/\/thenextweb.com\/plugged\/2020\/09\/15\/focals-new-bentley-themed-headphones-look-stunning\/\">Focal Radiance<\/a> is the literal Bentley of headphones. A limited edition model by the French high-end audio company, the headphones were designed in partnership with Bentley, while retaining much of the design language of Focal\u2019s other luxury headphones. Thankfully, they retain that high-end sound as well \u2014 as one would hope, for $1,300 (\u00a31199\/\u20ac1300).<\/p>\n<p>The Radiance is a gloriously flashy closed-back headphone. The black design with copper accents and diamond grille pattern looks stunning in person; it\u2019s the best looking of Focal\u2019s headphones I\u2019ve seen to date,&nbsp;though I do dig the new <a href=\"https:\/\/thenextweb.com\/plugged\/2021\/01\/28\/focals-new-celestee-headphones-are-a-990-audiophile-luxury\/\">Celestee<\/a>\u2018s blue design too.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/cdn0.tnwcdn.com\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/1\/files\/2020\/09\/Snag_10b993f-796x475.png\" class=\" lazy\" data-lazy=\"true\"><\/p>\n<p>Although a new design on the exterior, the Radiance follows the geometry of Focal\u2018s other high-end headphones. That\u2019s mostly a good thing, if you ask me. It\u2019s a comfortable design that I can wear for hours on end, and they block out a decent amount of noise too, although it won\u2019t be able to attenuate low frequency rumble the way a proper noise-canceling headphone would. Still if it ain\u2019t broke, don\u2019t fix it, I suppose.<\/p>\n<p>Although an expensive, wired headphone like this wouldn\u2019t exactly be my first choice to use on regular trips around town \u2014 Bluetooth is just too convenient, and the differences from wired audio are increasingly small these days \u2014 the headphones are easy to drive without a fancy amplifier. Whether using a cheap decent headphone dongle, your PC\u2019s headphone jack, or a proper headphone amp, you should have enough power to listen at a comfortable volume.<\/p>\n<p>And I\u2019m tempted to bring them around town because they sound so darn good. The Radiance are very close to neutrality for me right out of the box.<\/p>\n<p><figure class=\"post-image post-mediaBleed aligncenter\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-1339274 lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/cdn0.tnwcdn.com\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/1\/files\/2021\/02\/Snag_1995d7a4.png\" alt width=\"1021\" height=\"1048\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1021px) 100vw, 1021px\" data-lazy=\"true\" data-srcset=\"https:\/\/cdn0.tnwcdn.com\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/1\/files\/2021\/02\/Snag_1995d7a4.png 1021w, https:\/\/cdn0.tnwcdn.com\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/1\/files\/2021\/02\/Snag_1995d7a4-205x210.png 205w, https:\/\/cdn0.tnwcdn.com\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/1\/files\/2021\/02\/Snag_1995d7a4-263x270.png 263w, https:\/\/cdn0.tnwcdn.com\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/1\/files\/2021\/02\/Snag_1995d7a4-132x135.png 132w, https:\/\/cdn0.tnwcdn.com\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/1\/files\/2021\/02\/Snag_1995d7a4-796x817.png 796w\"><\/figure>\n<\/p>\n<p>The Radiance maintains the typical Focal headphone qualities of smooth mids and detailed highs. Here there is just not much to say \u2014 the headphones sound rather transparent without becoming too harsh for my tastes, though I might\u2019ve preferred maybe a touch more energy in treble; your mileage may vary. But unlike the company\u2019s&nbsp;open-back headphones (like the Focal Clear, one of my all-time favorites), the Radiance actually brings a serious amount of bass. It gives Focal\u2019s own <a href=\"https:\/\/thenextweb.com\/plugged\/2019\/04\/25\/focal-stellia-review-2999-headphones-youll-want-to-risk-bringing-everywhere\/\">$3,000 Stellia<\/a> a run for its money.<\/p>\n<p>I always like a headphone that can comfortably deliver into the sub-bass, and that\u2019s the case here, with the headphone comfortably extending below 20Hz for that all-important rumble in movies and hip-hop. If anything, the headphone\u2019s most notable flaw is that it might have a bit <em>too<\/em> much bass energy for my tastes higher up, at about 150Hz or so. This will ensure a good amount of \u2018thump\u2019 to your music, but it can occasionally muddy up the sound a little bit.<\/p>\n<p><figure class=\"post-image post-mediaBleed aligncenter\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-1339293 lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/cdn0.tnwcdn.com\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/1\/files\/2021\/02\/Focal-Radiance-2-of-3.jpg\" alt width=\"1640\" height=\"2187\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1640px) 100vw, 1640px\" data-lazy=\"true\" data-srcset=\"https:\/\/cdn0.tnwcdn.com\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/1\/files\/2021\/02\/Focal-Radiance-2-of-3.jpg 1640w, https:\/\/cdn0.tnwcdn.com\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/1\/files\/2021\/02\/Focal-Radiance-2-of-3-157x210.jpg 157w, https:\/\/cdn0.tnwcdn.com\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/1\/files\/2021\/02\/Focal-Radiance-2-of-3-202x270.jpg 202w, https:\/\/cdn0.tnwcdn.com\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/1\/files\/2021\/02\/Focal-Radiance-2-of-3-101x135.jpg 101w, https:\/\/cdn0.tnwcdn.com\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/1\/files\/2021\/02\/Focal-Radiance-2-of-3-796x1061.jpg 796w, https:\/\/cdn0.tnwcdn.com\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/1\/files\/2021\/02\/Focal-Radiance-2-of-3-1592x2123.jpg 1592w, https:\/\/cdn0.tnwcdn.com\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/1\/files\/2021\/02\/Focal-Radiance-2-of-3-1122x1496.jpg 1122w, https:\/\/cdn0.tnwcdn.com\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/1\/files\/2021\/02\/Focal-Radiance-2-of-3-840x1120.jpg 840w, https:\/\/cdn0.tnwcdn.com\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/1\/files\/2021\/02\/Focal-Radiance-2-of-3-687x916.jpg 687w, https:\/\/cdn0.tnwcdn.com\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/1\/files\/2021\/02\/Focal-Radiance-2-of-3-414x552.jpg 414w, https:\/\/cdn0.tnwcdn.com\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/1\/files\/2021\/02\/Focal-Radiance-2-of-3-354x472.jpg 354w\"><\/figure>\n<\/p>\n<p>But I\u2019m mostly splitting hairs; the Radiance performs admirably in its tonal balance, and the soundstage is similarly pleasant. While it certainly won\u2019t sound as expansive as an open-back pair of headphones, it\u2019s a more expansive soundstage than most closed-back headphones I\u2019ve tried.<\/p>\n<p>The tonal balance performance is evident in some rudimentary measurements as well. In the graph below, the dotted line represents the most recent <a href=\"https:\/\/www.headphones.com\/pages\/measurements-and-frequency-response\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\">Harman frequency response target<\/a> for headphones, developed through years of research into the listening preferences of people around the world. The target is generally found to be perceived as both neutral and enjoyable by listeners.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"post-image post-mediaBleed aligncenter\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"wp-image-1339273 size-full lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/cdn0.tnwcdn.com\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/1\/files\/2021\/02\/Radiance.png\" alt width=\"1200\" height=\"722\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1200px) 100vw, 1200px\" data-lazy=\"true\" data-srcset=\"https:\/\/cdn0.tnwcdn.com\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/1\/files\/2021\/02\/Radiance.png 1200w, https:\/\/cdn0.tnwcdn.com\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/1\/files\/2021\/02\/Radiance-280x168.png 280w, https:\/\/cdn0.tnwcdn.com\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/1\/files\/2021\/02\/Radiance-449x270.png 449w, https:\/\/cdn0.tnwcdn.com\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/1\/files\/2021\/02\/Radiance-224x135.png 224w, https:\/\/cdn0.tnwcdn.com\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/1\/files\/2021\/02\/Radiance-796x479.png 796w\"><figcaption><a href=\"https:\/\/thenextweb.com\/plugged\/2021\/02\/17\/focal-radiance-review-the-literal-bentley-of-headphones-sounds-fantastic\/#\" data-url=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?url=https%3A%2F%2Fthenextweb.com%2Fplugged%2F2021%2F02%2F17%2Ffocal-radiance-review-the-literal-bentley-of-headphones-sounds-fantastic%2F&amp;via=thenextweb&amp;related=thenextweb&amp;text=Check out this picture on: The Radiance\u2019s response was captured by taking 14 averages \u2014 7 of each earcup \u2014 repositioning the headphones slightly for every measurement. Measurements were taken with a MiniDSP Ears that has been calibrated to roughly match a professional GRAS measurement rig. Don\u2019t compare these measurements with others on the web; in particular, the measurements data becomes increasingly less reliable above 2kHz.\" data-title=\"Share The Radiance\u2019s response was captured by taking 14 averages \u2014 7 of each earcup \u2014 repositioning the headphones slightly for every measurement. Measurements were taken with a MiniDSP Ears that has been calibrated to roughly match a professional GRAS measurement rig. Don\u2019t compare these measurements with others on the web; in particular, the measurements data becomes increasingly less reliable above 2kHz. on Twitter\" data-width=\"685\" data-height=\"500\" class=\"post-image-share popitup\" title=\"Share The Radiance\u2019s response was captured by taking 14 averages \u2014 7 of each earcup \u2014 repositioning the headphones slightly for every measurement. Measurements were taken with a MiniDSP Ears that has been calibrated to roughly match a professional GRAS measurement rig. Don\u2019t compare these measurements with others on the web; in particular, the measurements data becomes increasingly less reliable above 2kHz. on Twitter\"><i class=\"icon icon--inline icon--twitter--dark\"><\/i><\/a>The Radiance\u2019s response was captured by taking 14 averages \u2014 7 of each earcup \u2014 repositioning the headphones slightly for every measurement. Measurements were taken with a MiniDSP Ears that has been calibrated to <em>roughly<\/em> match a professional GRAS measurement rig. Don\u2019t compare these measurements with others on the web; in particular, the measurements data becomes increasingly less reliable above 2kHz.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Although not <em>everyone<\/em> enjoys the sound of the Harman target, I use it in my reviews because I have consistently found <em>my own<\/em> preferences to follow the target; you can generally trust these graphs follow my own listening impressions. It\u2019s also worth pointing out the graph above is just meant as a rough quantification of tonality; given the limitations of my measurement equipment, the data is most accurate in the midrange and bass, and increasingly unreliable above 2kHz or so.<\/p>\n<p>Those disclaimers out of the way, you can see the Radiance roughly follows the contour of the target response. You can also see some exaggerated bass around roughly 80-200Hz, likely the source of the slight bloat I seemed to be perceiving, though again, you might like the additional bass. The midrange, meanwhile, follows the target very closely, and the highs generally track the contour, although the headphone might be missing a little treble energy below 10kHz (perhaps more notable given the slightly overemphasized bass).<\/p>\n<p><figure class=\"post-image post-mediaBleed aligncenter\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-1339294 lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/cdn0.tnwcdn.com\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/1\/files\/2021\/02\/Focal-Radiance-3-of-3.jpg\" alt width=\"1640\" height=\"924\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1640px) 100vw, 1640px\" data-lazy=\"true\" data-srcset=\"https:\/\/cdn0.tnwcdn.com\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/1\/files\/2021\/02\/Focal-Radiance-3-of-3.jpg 1640w, https:\/\/cdn0.tnwcdn.com\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/1\/files\/2021\/02\/Focal-Radiance-3-of-3-280x158.jpg 280w, https:\/\/cdn0.tnwcdn.com\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/1\/files\/2021\/02\/Focal-Radiance-3-of-3-479x270.jpg 479w, https:\/\/cdn0.tnwcdn.com\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/1\/files\/2021\/02\/Focal-Radiance-3-of-3-240x135.jpg 240w, https:\/\/cdn0.tnwcdn.com\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/1\/files\/2021\/02\/Focal-Radiance-3-of-3-796x448.jpg 796w, https:\/\/cdn0.tnwcdn.com\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/1\/files\/2021\/02\/Focal-Radiance-3-of-3-1592x897.jpg 1592w, https:\/\/cdn0.tnwcdn.com\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/1\/files\/2021\/02\/Focal-Radiance-3-of-3-1200x675.jpg 1200w\"><\/figure>\n<\/p>\n<p>These are small critiques. On the whole, my impression is that the Radiance performs as well as any of Focal\u2019s high-end headphones \u2014 practically on par with the more expensive Stellia, which uses fancier drivers. Though you don\u2019t need to spend $1,300 for good sound, if you\u2019re the type of audio enthusiast that doesn\u2019t think it\u2019s unreasonable to spend this kind of money on a pair of headphones, the Radiance are among the best closed-back headphones I\u2019ve heard.<\/p>\n<p><i>Did you know we have a newsletter all about consumer tech? It\u2019s called Plugged In \u2013 <a href=\"https:\/\/mailchi.mp\/thenextweb\/plugged-in\">and you can subscribe to it right here<\/a>. <\/i><\/p>\n<p class=\"c-post-pubDate\"> Published February 17, 2021 \u2014 08:18 UTC <\/p>\n<p> <a href=\"https:\/\/thenextweb.com\/plugged\/2021\/02\/17\/focal-radiance-review-the-literal-bentley-of-headphones-sounds-fantastic\/\">Source<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Focal Radiance is the literal Bentley of headphones. A limited edition model by the French high-end audio company, the headphones were designed in partnership with Bentley, while retaining much of the&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":3106,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.londonchiropracter.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3105"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.londonchiropracter.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.londonchiropracter.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.londonchiropracter.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.londonchiropracter.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3105"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.londonchiropracter.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3105\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.londonchiropracter.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/3106"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.londonchiropracter.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3105"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.londonchiropracter.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3105"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.londonchiropracter.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3105"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}