{"id":3209,"date":"2021-02-20T18:00:42","date_gmt":"2021-02-20T18:00:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/thenextweb.com\/?p=1339813"},"modified":"2021-02-20T18:00:42","modified_gmt":"2021-02-20T18:00:42","slug":"facebook-pulled-the-trigger-on-australian-news-and-shot-itself-in-the-foot","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.londonchiropracter.com\/?p=3209","title":{"rendered":"Facebook pulled the trigger on Australian news \u2014 and shot itself in the foot"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Facebook today made good on its <a href=\"https:\/\/about.fb.com\/news\/2021\/02\/changes-to-sharing-and-viewing-news-on-facebook-in-australia\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\">threat<\/a> to block Australians from accessing or posting news content. The ban includes blocking links to Australian and overseas news publishers.<\/p>\n<p>Facebook said the ban was a direct response to the federal government\u2019s news media code legislation, which is expected to become law soon and would require digital platforms such as Facebook and Google to pay news media companies whose content they host.<\/p>\n<h2>Why has Facebook done this?<\/h2>\n<p>The move is either a last-ditch attempt to gain concessions in the legislation or a simple cut-and-run by Facebook.<\/p>\n<p>The social media giant claims news publishers derive more value from news sharing than Facebook does. This is plausible, as news content makes up only <a href=\"https:\/\/about.fb.com\/news\/2021\/02\/changes-to-sharing-and-viewing-news-on-facebook-in-australia\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\">4% of sharing on the platform<\/a>, whereas many news sites gain a large fraction of their traffic from Facebook referrals.<\/p>\n<p>But this is probably more about flexing some muscle. Facebook may be demonstrating to the Federal government that if it doesn\u2019t like the rules, it can damage national interests.<\/p>\n<p><em>[Read:&nbsp;<a class=\"c-link c-message_attachment__title_link\" href=\"https:\/\/thenextweb.com\/plugged\/2020\/11\/27\/build-pet-friendly-gadget-experts-animal-owners-design\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" data-qa=\"message_attachment_title_link\"><span dir=\"auto\">How do you build a pet-friendly gadget? We asked experts and animal owners<\/span><\/a>]<\/em><\/p>\n<h2>Collateral damage<\/h2>\n<p>Australians will feel some short-term negative impacts of Facebook\u2019s flex.<\/p>\n<p>Certain government Facebook pages, such as those belonging to the Bureau of Meterology and some health department sites, have been caught up in the ban. Facebook says this is due to the wording of the legislation, stating:<\/p>\n<blockquote readability=\"7\">\n<p>As the law does not provide clear guidance on the definition of news content, we have taken a broad definition in order to respect the law as drafted.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>While Facebook says it will restore non-news pages, the action will put pressure on the government to define more clearly what it means by news content.<\/p>\n<p>In the meantime, the move will affect Australians\u2019 access to vital information related to emergencies and the COVID-19 pandemic. Without a concerted effort to ensure online behavior change from users, this could be dangerous.<\/p>\n<h2>Misinformation risk<\/h2>\n<p>We can also expect to see a short-term proliferation of misinformation as Facebook\u2019s news feed will have a vacuum of professionally sourced and fact-checked news.<\/p>\n<p>A significant number of Australians discuss news on Facebook, both via their newsfeed and in groups. Being able to source factual information from news sites is part of the everyday political and social participation that social media platforms facilitate.<\/p>\n<p>The democratic impact of Facebook\u2019s ban will be felt \u2013 and is counter to Facebook\u2019s stated principle of connecting people and its recent pledge to tackle misinformation.<\/p>\n<h2>Will it hurt Facebook?<\/h2>\n<p>The impact of this action against the legislation on Facebook itself is yet to be seen.<\/p>\n<p>The reputational damage from blocking important sites that serve Australia\u2019s public interest overnight \u2013 and yet taking years to get on top of user privacy breaches and misinformation \u2013 undermines the legitimacy of the platform and its claimed civic intentions.<\/p>\n<p>Facebook\u2019s actions may send a message to the government, but they will also send one to their Australian users.<\/p>\n<p>Readers are likely to find other ways to get their news. If we learn from the experience of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.newsmediaalliance.org\/google-news-shutdown-in-spain-not-as-bad-as-google-would-have-you-believe\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\">Google\u2019s news ban in Spain<\/a>, we can see that after an initial dip in traffic, most major news organizations in Spain regained much of their web traffic after about a year.<\/p>\n<h2>Surfing social waves<\/h2>\n<p>Tools such as Facebook are only useful if people want to use them. And for some existing users, the lack of news might be a dealbreaker.<\/p>\n<p>Facebook already faces a long-term problem of an aging user demographic, as under-25s turn to Instagram, Snapchat, and TikTok for <a href=\"https:\/\/www.digitalnewsreport.org\/survey\/2020\/overview-key-findings-2020\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\">news and information<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Young people may have Facebook profiles, but they are less likely to be <a href=\"https:\/\/www.pewresearch.org\/internet\/2018\/05\/31\/teens-social-media-technology-2018\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\">active users<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>News organizations are already following their lead. For example, The Conversation Australia has 325,735 Facebook followers and will probably feel the impact of the loss of engagement there.<\/p>\n<p>But it also has more than 21,000 Instagram followers and counting. It is increasingly making visual news \u201ctiles\u201d to cater to the younger demographic of users who source news from other platforms. It has also been working to reach readers directly via regular <a href=\"https:\/\/www.digitalnewsreport.org\/survey\/2020\/overview-key-findings-2020\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\">email newsletters<\/a>, which one in five US readers now say is their primary way of accessing news.<\/p>\n<p>News organizations have already learned how to pivot fast. When Facebook changed its algorithms in 2018 to deprioritize news publishers, many took action to reduce their reliance on Facebook\u2019s traffic, analytics, or digital advertising dollars.<\/p>\n<h2>What now?<\/h2>\n<p>Larger news organizations will be OK in the long run. But Australia\u2019s smaller outlets, including local publishers and non-profits that produce <span>public-interest<\/span>&nbsp;journalism, will need protection.<\/p>\n<p>The long-term task for news organizations and journalists is to convince the public \u2013 especially young people \u2013 that it\u2019s worthwhile to actively seek out professional news and journalism as part of their daily online lives, rather than simply reading <a href=\"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/abs\/10.1177\/1461444817750396\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\">whatever comes across their feed<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>As for Facebook, going back to its original purpose of facilitating personal connection and social networking, rather than posing as a forum for public information, may not be a bad thing. But the reputational damage and publisher exodus will eventually damage its core business: digital advertising revenue.<!-- Below is The Conversation's page counter tag. Please DO NOT REMOVE. --><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/counter.theconversation.com\/content\/155547\/count.gif?distributor=republish-lightbox-basic\" alt=\"The Conversation\" width=\"1\" height=\"1\" class=\" lazy\" data-lazy=\"true\"><!-- End of code. If you don't see any code above, please get new code from the Advanced tab after you click the republish button. The page counter does not collect any personal data. More info: https:\/\/theconversation.com\/republishing-guidelines --><\/p>\n<p><em>This article by&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/theconversation.com\/profiles\/diana-bossio-1649\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\">Diana Bossio<\/a>, Lecturer, Media and Communications, <a href=\"https:\/\/theconversation.com\/institutions\/swinburne-university-of-technology-767\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\">Swinburne University of Technology<\/a> is republished from <a href=\"https:\/\/theconversation.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\">The Conversation<\/a> under a Creative Commons license. Read the <a href=\"https:\/\/theconversation.com\/facebook-has-pulled-the-trigger-on-news-content-and-possibly-shot-itself-in-the-foot-155547\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\">original article<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n<p> <a href=\"https:\/\/thenextweb.com\/socialmedia\/2021\/02\/20\/how-australian-news-ban-is-hurting-facebook-syndication\/\">Source<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Facebook today made good on its threat to block Australians from accessing or posting news content. The ban includes blocking links to Australian and overseas news publishers. Facebook said the ban was&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":3210,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.londonchiropracter.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3209"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.londonchiropracter.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.londonchiropracter.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.londonchiropracter.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.londonchiropracter.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3209"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.londonchiropracter.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3209\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.londonchiropracter.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/3210"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.londonchiropracter.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3209"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.londonchiropracter.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3209"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.londonchiropracter.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3209"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}