{"id":8919,"date":"2021-11-13T02:12:15","date_gmt":"2021-11-13T02:12:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/TheNextWeb=1373195"},"modified":"2021-11-13T02:12:15","modified_gmt":"2021-11-13T02:12:15","slug":"the-pixel-fold-may-not-match-the-pixel-6s-camera-and-thats-good-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.londonchiropracter.com\/?p=8919","title":{"rendered":"The Pixel Fold may not match the Pixel 6\u2019s camera, and that\u2019s good news"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>We\u2019ve been hearing rumors about a \u2018Pixel Fold\u2018 for <em><a href=\"https:\/\/thenextweb.com\/news\/foldable-phone-race-heats-up-as-google-enters-the-fold\">years<\/a><\/em> now, but leaks have ramped up lately, suggesting Google may finally be ready to unveil it early next year. But if the latest leaks turn out to be true, the Pixel Fold may not be quite as premium a device as many were expecting \u2014 and might not be such a bad thing.<\/p>\n<p>Last week, <a href=\"https:\/\/9to5google.com\/2021\/11\/04\/googles-pixel-foldable-coming-in-2022-cameras-will-be-a-step-down-from-pixel-6\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\">9to5Google<\/a> reported that the foldable Pixel may not be using the same giant camera sensor in the Pixel 6 and 6 Pro, instead opting for what appears to be the same old, small sensor in the budget Pixel 5a\u2026 as well as the Pixel 5, 4a 5G, Pixel 4 and Pixel 3. Google has sure gotten a lot of mileage out of that Sony IMX363 sensor.<\/p>\n<p>I\u2019ve been thinking about this leak a lot. At first glance, that\u2019s a shame. The <a href=\"https:\/\/thenextweb.com\/news\/pixel-6-hands-on\">Pixel 6 and 6 Pro<\/a> showed that Google was <em>finally<\/em> getting serious about hardware. Google used one of the best camera sensors on the market, the <a href=\"https:\/\/thenextweb.com\/news\/google-pixel-6-sensor-4x-pixel-5\">massive Samsung GN1<\/a>, for its primary camera, immediately catapulting its imaging hardware to match some of the best in the biz.<\/p>\n<p>To go back to a tiny-by-2021-standards sensor seems like a misstep for a company that has spent the past several months building up its hardware cred, in no small part because of the Google Tensor processor.<\/p>\n<p>But after my initial disappointment, I\u2019ve come to realize this news might actually be pretty great. It points to one important possibility: a cheap folding phone. Relatively speaking, anyway.<\/p>\n<h3>Make the price right<\/h3>\n<p>Now, I obviously have no way of knowing for sure how much the foldable Pixel will cost, but if the Pixel 6 is anything to go by, I\u2019d bet my bottom dollar that Google is aiming for very aggressive pricing.<\/p>\n<p>At $599, the smaller Pixel 6 undercut other flagship competition by a substantial margin, likely shaking up the way phone makers will price their devices going forward. The Pixel 6\u2019s hardware is in many ways comparable to the iPhone 13 and Galaxy S21\u2019s, but Google\u2019s phone comes in $200 cheaper than those phones did at launch.<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, folding phones so far have been ludicrously expensive \u2014 especially the ones that unfold into tablet-sized devices. The Galaxy Fold 3, the most famous of these, costs $1,800. It\u2019s the price alone that automatically eliminates these types of devices as an option for many people.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"post-image post-mediaBleed aligncenter\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/img-cdn.tnwcdn.com\/image?fit=1280%2C720&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn0.tnwcdn.com%2Fwp-content%2Fblogs.dir%2F1%2Ffiles%2F2021%2F08%2FSnag_938d124.png&amp;signature=3ea52212af51916cdf4bc6fd4e6e48b7\" alt=\"Samsung\u2019s Galaxy Z Fold 3\" width=\"1280\" height=\"720\" class=\"js-lazy\"><figcaption><a href=\"https:\/\/thenextweb.com\/news\/pixel-fold-small-sensor-is-okay#\" data-url=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?url=https%3A%2F%2Feditorial.thenextweb.com%2Fplugged%2F2021%2F11%2F13%2Fpixel-fold-small-sensor-is-okay%2F&amp;via=thenextweb&amp;related=thenextweb&amp;text=Check out this picture on: The Galaxy Fold is a fantastic phone held back mainly by its astronomical price.\" data-title=\"Share The Galaxy Fold is a fantastic phone held back mainly by its astronomical price. on Twitter\" data-width=\"685\" data-height=\"500\" class=\"post-image-share popitup\" title=\"Share The Galaxy Fold is a fantastic phone held back mainly by its astronomical price. on Twitter\"><i class=\"icon icon--inline icon--twitter--dark\"><\/i><\/a>The Galaxy Fold is a fantastic phone held back mainly by its astronomical price.<\/figcaption><noscript><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/img-cdn.tnwcdn.com\/image?fit=1280%2C720&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn0.tnwcdn.com%2Fwp-content%2Fblogs.dir%2F1%2Ffiles%2F2021%2F08%2FSnag_938d124.png&amp;signature=3ea52212af51916cdf4bc6fd4e6e48b7\" alt=\"Samsung\u2019s Galaxy Z Fold 3\" width=\"1280\" height=\"720\" class><\/noscript><\/figure>\n<p>The Galaxy <em>Flip<\/em> 3 made a big step toward making folding phones more accessible by bringing the price down to $1,000. But having tested the Flip and Fold concurrently, I think it\u2019s pretty clear the former is the more interesting and more useful device.<\/p>\n<p>The folding screen is mostly a novelty on the Flip \u2014 a cool party trick with the occasional benefit of helping you disengage from your usual barrage of notifications. But at the end of the day, you\u2019re still doing the same phone stuff you\u2019ve always done, but on a device with a smaller battery and less durable screen.<\/p>\n<p>The Galaxy Fold, on the other hand, completely changes the way I think about using my phone. It\u2019s pretty much a tablet with a useful stylus, and I can actually get some real work done on it.<\/p>\n<p>The problem, again, is the price.<\/p>\n<p>So if Google can price the phone cheaper by using the same sensor it\u2019s had since 2018, so be it. Given recent trends and the choice of sensor, I\u2019m convinced Google is looking to announce the foldable Pixel to a price far lower than the Galaxy Fold 3. I\u2019m completely making a guess here, but I would be shocked if it were a cent more than $1,500,&nbsp; and I expect to be closer to $1,200. If we\u2019re lucky, even less.<\/p>\n<h3>A big sensor isn\u2019t necessary<\/h3>\n<p>But will people still want to buy a high-end phone with a wimpy camera sensor in 2021? I\u2019d argue that if it\u2019s from Google \u2014 and the price isn\u2019t <em>too<\/em> high \u2014 the answer is yes.<\/p>\n<p>I\u2019m not sure any other company (besides maybe Apple) could get away with that, but Google has lagged behind the camera hardware in its competitors\u2019 devices for years now. Still, its phones have regularly been considered to deliver some of the best images on the market, because Google\u2019s processing is just <em>that<\/em> good.<\/p>\n<p>In a kind of ironic way, the Pixel 6 and 6 Pro themselves are the best proof of it.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"post-image post-mediaBleed aligncenter\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-full wp-image-1373197 js-lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/cdn0.tnwcdn.com\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/1\/files\/2021\/11\/Snag_d98b816.png\" alt=\"Pixel 5 vs Pixel 6 sensor size comparison\" width=\"655\" height=\"661\" sizes=\"(max-width: 655px) 100vw, 655px\" data-srcset=\"https:\/\/cdn0.tnwcdn.com\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/1\/files\/2021\/11\/Snag_d98b816.png 655w, https:\/\/cdn0.tnwcdn.com\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/1\/files\/2021\/11\/Snag_d98b816-208x210.png 208w, https:\/\/cdn0.tnwcdn.com\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/1\/files\/2021\/11\/Snag_d98b816-134x135.png 134w, https:\/\/cdn0.tnwcdn.com\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/1\/files\/2021\/11\/Snag_d98b816-96x96.png 96w, https:\/\/cdn0.tnwcdn.com\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/1\/files\/2021\/11\/Snag_d98b816-268x270.png 268w\"><figcaption><a href=\"https:\/\/thenextweb.com\/news\/pixel-fold-small-sensor-is-okay#\" data-url=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?url=https%3A%2F%2Feditorial.thenextweb.com%2Fplugged%2F2021%2F11%2F13%2Fpixel-fold-small-sensor-is-okay%2F&amp;via=thenextweb&amp;related=thenextweb&amp;text=Check out this picture on: This image shows just how much smaller the sensor in the Pixel 5 is compared to the Pixel 6 Pro. It seems very likely the foldable Pixel will use the same sensor in the Pixel 5.\" data-title=\"Share This image shows just how much smaller the sensor in the Pixel 5 is compared to the Pixel 6 Pro. It seems very likely the foldable Pixel will use the same sensor in the Pixel 5. on Twitter\" data-width=\"685\" data-height=\"500\" class=\"post-image-share popitup\" title=\"Share This image shows just how much smaller the sensor in the Pixel 5 is compared to the Pixel 6 Pro. It seems very likely the foldable Pixel will use the same sensor in the Pixel 5. on Twitter\"><i class=\"icon icon--inline icon--twitter--dark\"><\/i><\/a>This image shows just how much smaller the sensor in the Pixel 5 is compared to the Pixel 6 Pro. It seems very likely the foldable Pixel will use the same sensor in the Pixel 5.<\/figcaption><noscript><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-full wp-image-1373197\" src=\"https:\/\/cdn0.tnwcdn.com\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/1\/files\/2021\/11\/Snag_d98b816.png\" alt=\"Pixel 5 vs Pixel 6 sensor size comparison\" width=\"655\" height=\"661\" srcset=\"https:\/\/cdn0.tnwcdn.com\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/1\/files\/2021\/11\/Snag_d98b816.png 655w, https:\/\/cdn0.tnwcdn.com\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/1\/files\/2021\/11\/Snag_d98b816-208x210.png 208w, https:\/\/cdn0.tnwcdn.com\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/1\/files\/2021\/11\/Snag_d98b816-134x135.png 134w, https:\/\/cdn0.tnwcdn.com\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/1\/files\/2021\/11\/Snag_d98b816-96x96.png 96w, https:\/\/cdn0.tnwcdn.com\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/1\/files\/2021\/11\/Snag_d98b816-268x270.png 268w\"><\/noscript><\/figure>\n<p>The Pixel 6 Pro may very well have the best cameras on the market, but having tested the phone shortly after the <a href=\"https:\/\/thenextweb.com\/news\/pixel-5a\">Pixel 5a<\/a>, two things stood out in particular:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>In most conditions, the Pixel 5a\u2019s images look quite similar to the Pixel 6\u2019s.<\/li>\n<li>The best features in the Pixel 6 were related to the Tensor chip, not the camera hardware itself.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Don\u2019t get me wrong; the Pixel 6 Pro\u2019s fancy telephoto lens is excellent, and the camera does edge out its predecessors in every respect, especially in extremely low light or in creating shallow depth of field. If Google <em>could<\/em> make an affordable Pixel Fold while keeping the same hardware in the Pixel 6 Pro, I\u2019d be all for it. But for day-to-day images meant to go on social media, these improvements are largely subtle.<\/p>\n<p>In many ways, the Pixel 6\u2019s camera hardware is kind of a flex; it\u2019s as if Google is telling us \u201csee? we didn\u2019t need the best sensors to deliver great images, but at least now you\u2019re getting your money\u2019s worth.\u201d For <em>most<\/em> situations, the Pixel 6 didn\u2019t provide the dramatic generational leap that I think many of us were expecting, simply because Google was already pushing the limits on the software side.<\/p>\n<p>Instead, it was the Tensor-powered features like the <a href=\"https:\/\/blog.google\/products\/photos\/magic-eraser\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\">Magic Eraser<\/a> and Motion Mode that really wowed me. And it is practically a guarantee that the foldable Pixel will use the Google Tensor chip.<\/p>\n<h3>A foldable phone people will actually buy?<\/h3>\n<p>I realize there\u2019s a lot of conjecture and guesstimating in this opinion article, but given what we saw with the Pixel 6, I have little doubt Google wants to make the Pixel Fold as tempting of a purchase as possible. Besides, it\u2019s unlike Google to target the ultra-premium price range. As a brand, Google has rarely played in that luxury space the way Apple and Samsung do, and it\u2019s had a history of undercutting competitors starting with the old Nexus phones.<\/p>\n<p>Think about it: which would you be more likely to buy? A Pixel Fold that costs $1,800 with some of the best camera hardware on the market, or a $1,200 Pixel Fold that takes only a mild hit in image quality?<\/p>\n<p>I know which one I\u2019d pick.<\/p>\n<p> <a href=\"https:\/\/thenextweb.com\/news\/pixel-fold-small-sensor-is-okay\">Source<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>We\u2019ve been hearing rumors about a \u2018Pixel Fold\u2018 for years now, but leaks have ramped up lately, suggesting Google may finally be ready to unveil it early next year. But if the&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":8920,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.londonchiropracter.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8919"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.londonchiropracter.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.londonchiropracter.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.londonchiropracter.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.londonchiropracter.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=8919"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.londonchiropracter.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8919\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.londonchiropracter.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/8920"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.londonchiropracter.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=8919"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.londonchiropracter.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=8919"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.londonchiropracter.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=8919"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}