Londonchiropracter.com

This domain is available to be leased

Menu
Menu

Tesla vs. robotaxis: Who’s winning the autonomous vehicle race?

Posted on February 11, 2022 by admin

We’re on the edge of a major social shift in mobility. Autonomous vehicles are going to change our lives. Commutes will be unrecognizable, cities will change, and industries reshaped. 

We’re still a long way away from that — but companies are edging ever closer.

There are prime examples, both approaching the challenge in very different ways. The first is Tesla, with its beta-testing of Level 2 driver-assist tech that aims to progress to full vehicle automation.

The second is a group of companies involved in the development and deployment of autonomous robotaxis.

But how do they compare? And how do we get from here to a fully autonomous future?

If we look beyond the tech alone, two significant measures of success come to mind: partnerships and capacity for scale.

By partnerships, I mean industry collaborations that advance not only the number of vehicles, but the tech, as well as its accessibility to users.

Scale is also critical. We need a lot of cars on the road before vehicle automation is anywhere near hitting critical mass. 

Let’s a look at how the two approaches face up against each other.

How do Tesla sales compare to the number of robotaxis on the road?

Tesla Model S second place for best-selling used EV in the US
Tesla sales have grown massively. Credit: Tesla

In 2021, Tesla reportedly produced and delivered over 930,000 electric cars worldwide. 

If we look at the number of sales alone, that’s a mammoth army of Tesla owners. 

And, spoiler: there is nowhere near that number of autonomous robotaxis on the roads – in testing or otherwise. So, if Tesla can successfully develop autonomous tech, they win the battle on private car ownership alone. 

That’s a big “if” though, especially considering they’re only testing Level 2 vehicle automation.

So, could Tesla even get from cars to robotaxis? 

Currently, Tesla’s driver-assist cannot be deployed without an initial safety score determined by monitoring user behavior over some time.

If the company’s goal is to go from driver-assist FSD to robotaxi, a lot needs to go right. Plus, there has to be a technological improvement — much of which current robotaxi makers are already deploying.

The reality is that no one knows how easy it will be to switch Tesla FSD beta testers into Level 3 and 4 autonomation, let alone full automation.

Last year Musk announced that the number of American FSD Beta vehicles went from a couple of thousand in Q3, to nearly 60,000 by the end of Q4 — a massive leap in anyone’s book. 

By comparison, if we look at China, the adoption of FSD is surprisingly low. It sits at 1% to 2%, compared to an adoption of 20% to 25% in the US and Europe. 

Tesla’s business model is deploying owners to test their software as it evolves, so they can iron out the bugs. 

But these low adoption rates suggest there are a lot of people who don’t want to drive their car with driver-assist, let alone full automation. This makes it difficult to advance their driving tech in the real world. Especially when we compare it to the heavy lifting already done by companies like Argo, Cruise, and Waymo.

But Tesla’s gaining partners

Prior to the challenges of getting enough beta testers, Elon Musk predicted that Tesla will have their own robotaxis on the road by 2023.  Can it succeed?

How long for the first robotaxi release/ deployment? 2023?

— Pranay Pathole (@PPathole) April 12, 2020

In 2021, the company sold over 100,000 Model 3 cars to Hertz. And in October of the same year, Hertz and Uber also announced a partnership to make up to 50,000 Teslas available by 2023 for Uber drivers to rent. 

But does this translate to 100,000 robotaxis in the making? Hardly! They’re still beta testing Level 2!

Compare this to the groundwork existing robotaxi companies have put in.

Autonomous Robotaxi are deeply partners with the titans of industry

Robotaxi companies Baidu Apollo, AutoX, Pony.ai, WeRide, Didi, WeRide, Waymo, Argo, Aurora, and Cruise, are all partnering with various brands to develop the technology needed to get autonomous taxis on the road. 

robotaxis
A look at the current robotaxi landscape. Credit: Egil Juliussen

Cruise (majority-owned by GM) is currently deploying autonomous robotaxis in San Francisco. In 2021, Cruise CEO Dan Ammann announced a target for at least one million self-driving vehicles by 2030.  This feels like a far more realistic and achievable aim than what Tesla has suggested.

Meet the Cruise Origin. No steering wheel. No mirrors. No pedals. Credit: Cruise

There’s also the challenge of geographic expansion 

 It’s not all plain sailing. Let’s not forget how the legal status of autonomous vehicle technology differs wildly throughout different parts of the US. How easy will it be to get all states on board? 

Currently, autonomous taxis only operate on pre-mapped streets. By comparison, Tesla FSD drivers can go anywhere. 

We have no way to know if autonomous robotaxis will have mapped the whole of the US before Teslas are operating without human drivers.

Who’s in the best position?

If I was to place a bet, I think we’ll see more Teslas on the road than robotaxis.

But here’s the kicker: the Teslas won’t be autonomous. Maybe they’ll progress from Level 2, but I can’t see them going from Level 2 to 5 without a lot of challenges — especially in safety and regulatory approval.

So there we are. The robotaxi industry and Tesla have significant challenges scaling and evolving their tech. Furthermore, they all need to convince the public that they want to travel by autonomous vehicle — and this may be their biggest challenge of all.

Source

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Jeff Bezos’s representative just left the board of a startup that raised $1.4 billion on his name. The first truck has not been built.
  • Quantum Motion lands $160m in EU’s first major late-stage commitment
  • Google’s AI Overviews killed 58 per cent of publisher clicks. Now it is adding a ‘Further Exploration’ section to bring some back.
  • Snap lost a 400 million dollar AI deal, 20 million dollars a month to the Iran war, and 24 per cent of its stock price. The AR glasses had better work.
  • The UAE’s AI champion just leased a converted Minneapolis office. The irony writes itself.

Recent Comments

    Archives

    • May 2026
    • April 2026
    • March 2026
    • February 2026
    • January 2026
    • December 2025
    • September 2025
    • August 2025
    • July 2025
    • June 2025
    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • August 2024
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • August 2023
    • July 2023
    • June 2023
    • May 2023
    • April 2023
    • March 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020

    Categories

    • Uncategorized

    Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org
    ©2026 Londonchiropracter.com | Design: Newspaperly WordPress Theme