Londonchiropracter.com

This domain is available to be leased

Menu
Menu

EVs aren’t enough! The UK must slash drive-throughs to save the environment

Posted on February 16, 2022 by admin

Drive-throughs – services that let people order and collect food and drink without needing to leave their cars – are designed with convenience in mind. Whether it’s oppressively hot, uncomfortably cold, or we’re just in a hurry, drive-throughs have become very appealing in an era characterised by a desire for immediacy.

In the UK, where there are around 2,000 drive-throughs, it’s not unusual to see snaking queues of vehicles whose drivers are waiting for their turn to make, pay for, and collect their orders.

In fact, drive-throughs are on an upward trajectory in the UK. There was a 41% increase in the number of drive-throughs between 2015 and 2020, and 12% of sales at fast food restaurants and coffee chains were made through their drive-through sites in the year to March 2021: jumping 50% from pre-COVID figures.

This service has become indispensable for many. Drive-throughs provide benefits for people with mobility challenges as well as those with intensely busy schedules or people wrangling small children. In the US, even some banks and pharmacies offer drive-through options. And by helping customers avoid indoor dining, drive-throughs may have also helped limit the spread of COVID-19. But drive-throughs come at a cost.

First, drive-throughs require excessive idling, something that is banned on public roads in the UK but regularly and casually done in drive-through queues. In addition to increasing emissions, wasting fuel and damaging engines, exhaust pipe emissions associated with idling create local air pollution with serious environmental and health consequences.

Poor air quality is already a widespread problem in the UK where more than two-thirds of local authorities breach air quality targets. Even if we were to meet these targets, the Royal College of Physicians has warned that only a fraction of incidences of air quality-related illnesses – including lung cancer, asthma attacks, and overall lower life expectancy – would be prevented. Currently, air pollution leads to 40,000 deaths per year in the UK, with annual costs to the NHS of more than £20 billion.

The UK must slash drive-throughs
Idling in drive-through queues is bad for people and the planet. Image: Prayitnophotography/Flickr

In light of the ongoing transition towards electric vehicles, the environmental concerns of idling will diminish. The UK’s plan to phase out sales of internal combustion engines will also reduce exhaust pipe emissions as we head towards 2050.

Yet even so, emissions from brake wear and tyre wear are respectively responsible for 16-55% and 5-30% of non-exhaust emissions in UK towns and cities. That means air pollution and its associated health effects will not be completely resolved by the switch to electric cars.

The bottom line

Around the world, cities have begun to crack down on the drive-through, despite renewed investment following the pandemic. Some regions in Canada and the United States have already banned or restricted new drive-throughs, while cities such as Glasgow are beginning to consider following suit. As the UK tries to reduce car ownership and use, drive-throughs will also inevitably be discouraged.

Curbing the expansion of drive-throughs now will not severely affect UK restaurants’ revenue: especially given their relatively low market share when you consider that 70% of fast food sales in the United States are made via drive-throughs. However, the negative implications of “drive-through culture” have deeper roots.

Car-centric transport planning has dominated UK urban development since the second world war. It has increased congestion and contributed to public health problems such as the effects of poor air quality and the growing incidence of obesity, while cutting the share of trips taken via more environmentally friendly options such as public transport, cycling and walking.

The UK must slash drive-throughs
In many countries, the huge amount of space reserved for cars could be used to improve health and wellbeing. Image: Antonio Silveira/Flickr

Urban development that prioritises cars is also inconsistent with UK government goals to improve wellbeing, food systems and public health. Instead, building cities with wider pavements, segregated bicycle paths and widespread public transport – where we can reduce our reliance on cars and fast food – represents the healthy urban future that experts suggest we should try to create.

And for those with mobility or childcare issues, the growth of smartphone apps enabling restaurant-to-car delivery outside of drive-throughs allows people to conveniently and safely collect food without needing to queue. Food delivery apps whose riders use bicycles can also help reduce car trips while maintaining convenience.

Collectively, we need to reflect on the profoundly negative effects of living in a society that has become so pressed for time that we cannot afford to get out of our cars to collect food, let alone to eat it.

Fundamentally, drive-throughs are symptomatic of a mode of living from which we need to move away – for the sake of our planet. Limiting them in the UK would be a sign of progress not just for the environment but for our society too.

This article by Eugene Mohareb, Lecturer in Sustainable Urban Systems, University of Reading, and Sybil Derrible, Associate Professor of Urban Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Source

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Jeff Bezos’s representative just left the board of a startup that raised $1.4 billion on his name. The first truck has not been built.
  • Quantum Motion lands $160m in EU’s first major late-stage commitment
  • Google’s AI Overviews killed 58 per cent of publisher clicks. Now it is adding a ‘Further Exploration’ section to bring some back.
  • Snap lost a 400 million dollar AI deal, 20 million dollars a month to the Iran war, and 24 per cent of its stock price. The AR glasses had better work.
  • The UAE’s AI champion just leased a converted Minneapolis office. The irony writes itself.

Recent Comments

    Archives

    • May 2026
    • April 2026
    • March 2026
    • February 2026
    • January 2026
    • December 2025
    • September 2025
    • August 2025
    • July 2025
    • June 2025
    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • August 2024
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • August 2023
    • July 2023
    • June 2023
    • May 2023
    • April 2023
    • March 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020

    Categories

    • Uncategorized

    Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org
    ©2026 Londonchiropracter.com | Design: Newspaperly WordPress Theme