Londonchiropracter.com

This domain is available to be leased

Menu
Menu

I’m sold on the Samsung Galaxy Fold, but I say skip the Flip

Posted on February 24, 2022 by admin

Phone manufacturers spent most of the 2010s shrinking bezels and seeing how large a design they could get away with. Eventually, pretty much every phone on the market was just one big screen housed in a metal and glass chassis. Phones couldn’t get any larger without looking absurd. There was pretty much nowhere left to go.

And so, the folding phone was born.

The advent of folding displays has opened the door to all sorts of new form factors, but so far the market seems to have settled on the two designs offered by Samsung: roughly regular-sized phones that unfold into little tablets, a la Galaxy Fold, and compact clamshell phones that unfold into a regular-sized screen, like the Galaxy Flip.

After living with both of Samsung’s most recent folding phones for a few months (provided by AT&T for testing) I’ve come to an important conclusion: I absolutely love the Galaxy Fold’s design, but I just can’t recommend the Flip to most people.

Sold on the Fold

The Galaxy Z Fold 3’s appeal is quite simple, really: this type of folding design adds tremendous functionality and versatility. 

You get a screen nearly the size of an iPad Mini in a phone that fits in your pocket. It’s a size that’s genuinely useful for taking notes, reading books, watching videos… or even doing those things all at once.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3
Running two apps at a time on the Fold feels completely natural — or even three.

Granted, it’s super expensive, at $1,800, but can usually be found for far less — and it feels like you’re getting your money’s worth. Using the Galaxy Fold or one of its copycats — perhaps it’s time to bring back the term ‘’phablet” for this particular category — is pretty much a productivity and entertainment revolution for someone like me, who actually tries to get work done on his phone.

It blurs the line between what a phone and a laptop can do, and in my case, at least, it’s more useful than a typical tablet simply because I can carry it around anywhere. To paraphrase an old photography idiom, the best tablet is the one you have with you.

At this point, I’m just waiting for phones that can pull off even wilder origami to hit the market, so I can fit an even larger screen into a small footprint. In the meantime, the Galaxy Fold is one of the most satisfying phones I’ve ever had the pleasure of using.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3
Reading books on the Fold is a glorious experience.

In case you’re wondering about that fragile screen, by the way; to my surprise, it’s been a non-issue. With regular use, the interior screen has fewer blemishes than my Pixel 6 Pro (or the Fold’s own exterior screen for that matter), simply by virtue of being less exposed to the elements.

Skip the Flip

My experience using the Galaxy Z Flip 3 started off great. It folds in half too, just smaller! I expected to recommend the Flip more than the Fold because of its lower price tag ($999), but in the long run, it basically feels like you’re paying a premium and sacrificing functionality for little more than a neat party trick.

The Galaxy Z Flip 3 folds to take up a smaller footprint than the vast majority of phones. But since it’s also twice as thick as most phones, it doesn’t feel like it’s that much more pocket-friendly to me.

I so wanted to love this phone. It looks so cool. Opening and closing the clamshell design is utterly satisfying. It tickles nostalgia from days of phones like the Moto RAZR (which has been revived as its own Flip-style phone). People will ask you questions about it, and there’s absolutely nothing wrong with simply wanting a phone that just looks nice either.

But if you buy a phone like the Galaxy Flip, you have to be ready to accept that it can do very little that your current phone can’t already do. And in some important regards — battery life in particular, but also overall durability, camera quality, and features — it’s almost certainly going to be straight-up worse than a comparable slab-type phone. You’re always going to lose real estate for components and battery capacity in order to fit that folding mechanism.

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 vs Pixel 6
The Flip 3 (left) vs the Pixel 6 Pro (right). The Flip 3 is $100 more expensive than the Pixel 6 Pro, but has significantly worse battery performance, despite being a similar size overall.

As cool as the clamshell design is, the novelty does eventually wear off. Once that happens, all you’ll care about is how good the phone actually is. 

Don’t get me wrong; the Flip 3 isn’t a bad phone by any means, but I just found the initial hype didn’t pay off in long-term value. Other than fitting slightly more comfortably in my pocket (it’s still very thick once folded), I eventually felt myself longing for a regular phone. The battery life on the Flip isn’t terrible, but it’s noticeably short by modern flagship standards, and it’s only gotten worse with time.

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3
The Flip 3 certainly looks cool, at least.

Yes, the Galaxy Fold is much more expensive than the Flip, and it’s pretty remarkable Samsung was able to bring the Flip’s price down to just shy of a grand. The Flip 3’s attractive design and accessible (by usual flagship phone standards) price worked out for Samsung, helping convert buyers using phones from other companies.

But if price or compactness isn’t your primary consideration, I suggest you consider the folding phone that actually brings new functionality to the table. The novelty wears off on the Flip, but it never does with the Fold.

Source

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • SpaceX draws $89 billion in demand for its debut bond sale, one of the largest US offerings this year
  • The American dream is ‘very dead’ for young Americans, says Mrs. Dow Jones
  • Nearly 60% of TikTok videos shown to new users are AI slop, study finds
  • Apple’s design studio has lost nearly every Jony Ive-era designer. Incoming CEO John Ternus says he’ll fix it.
  • A 201-year-old mutual bank just launched an AI Center of Excellence with a startup partner

Recent Comments

    Archives

    • June 2026
    • May 2026
    • April 2026
    • March 2026
    • February 2026
    • January 2026
    • December 2025
    • September 2025
    • August 2025
    • July 2025
    • June 2025
    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • August 2024
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • August 2023
    • July 2023
    • June 2023
    • May 2023
    • April 2023
    • March 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020

    Categories

    • Uncategorized

    Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org
    ©2026 Londonchiropracter.com | Design: Newspaperly WordPress Theme