Londonchiropracter.com

This domain is available to be leased

Menu
Menu

Why the EU is imposing maximum tariffs of 36.7% on Chinese EVs

Posted on July 4, 2024 by admin

The EU today confirmed huge new tariffs for EVs imported from China.

From Friday, provisional charges of between 17.4% and 37.6% will apply to the vehicles.

The lowest level will apply to BYD, an automaker based in Shenzhen. Geely, which owns Volvo, Polestar, and Lotus, faces duties of 19.9%. SAIC, a Chinese state-owned carmaker, will receive the maximum 37.6%.

Other companies will be subject to new tariffs of 20.8%, the weighted average.

These fees will come on top of a 10% duty that was already in place. As a result, prices of EVs in Europe could increase. Beijing may also impose retaliatory measures.

Nonetheless, the EU argues that the intervention is essential.

Why is the EU imposing the new tariffs?

The tariffs are an attempt to protect the EU auto industry. Beijing has been accused of creating unfair competition through “illegal subsidisation” of Chinese EV makers.

Last October, the EU opened an investigation into the matter.

“The electric vehicle sector holds huge potential for Europe’s future competitiveness and green industrial leadership,” Ursula von der Leyen, the European Commission president, said at the probe’s launch.

“EU car manufacturers and related sectors are already investing and innovating to fully develop this potential. Wherever we find evidence that their efforts are being impeded by market distortions and unfair competition, we will act decisively.”

The EU has now concluded that the subsidies are indeed unfair. With access to this state supports, Chinese EV makers stand accused of artificially lowering prices.

According to Brussels, this threatens “economic injury” to the bloc’s carmakers. But not everyone in the EU supports the new tariffs.

Reactions in the EU

Government officials and carmakers have raised several objections to the tariffs.

Sweden’s prime minister fears the duties will escalate “a wider trade war.” Germany’s chancellor warned the measures will also harm EU companies that import EVs from China.

Hungary, which has forged a strong trade partnership with Beijing, has provided sterner rebukes. “We disagree with the brutal European punishment of Chinese electric car manufacturers with punitive tariffs,” the country’s economic ministry said last month. “Protectionism is not the solution.”

German car giant Volkswagen has also slammed the charges. “The negative effects of this decision outweigh any benefits for the European and especially the German automotive industry,” a company spokesperson said in a statement.

Industry analysts have also questioned the EU’s plans. James Edmondson, an EV expert at market intelligence firm IDTechEx, fears that the plan will backfire.

“The long term impact of restricting trade with China more generally could be detrimental to EU manufacturers and adoption of EVs especially when the EU is still so reliant on China for components like EV batteries,” he told TNW last month.

Inevitably, the EU has downplayed these concerns. The bloc’s trade chief, Valdis Dombrovskis, said discussions with Beijing could still create a mutually beneficial resolution.

“Our aim is to… ensure fair competition and level playing field,” Dombrovskis told Bloomberg News today. “Therefore, once again, we do not see any basis for retaliation.”Those talks with China are ongoing and indeed should a mutually beneficial solution emerge, we can also find ways not to apply at the end of the day the tariffs.”

Source

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • GitHub freezes new Copilot sign-ups as agentic AI breaks the economics of flat-rate developer subscriptions
  • Ofcom opens formal investigation into Telegram over child sexual abuse concerns
  • What’s the Best Medical Alert System of 2026? Comparing 7 major brands
  • Seapoint raises €7.5M and opens to all UK and Irish founders
  • SpaceX’s public IPO filing confirms Musk and insiders retain dominant voting control

Recent Comments

    Archives

    • April 2026
    • March 2026
    • February 2026
    • January 2026
    • December 2025
    • September 2025
    • August 2025
    • July 2025
    • June 2025
    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • August 2024
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • August 2023
    • July 2023
    • June 2023
    • May 2023
    • April 2023
    • March 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020

    Categories

    • Uncategorized

    Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org
    ©2026 Londonchiropracter.com | Design: Newspaperly WordPress Theme