Londonchiropracter.com

This domain is available to be leased

Menu
Menu

€199B: The cost of overlooking European deep tech firms led by women

Posted on March 4, 2025 by admin

It’s no secret that European tech has a gender equity problem. Men dominate the leadership of most companies in the sector. Women founders struggle to raise VC money, and there’s a stark pay gap between male and female workers. This gender imbalance is especially glaring in the STEM-dominated world of deep tech. 

Women lead just 22% of European deep tech companies, according to a new report from the EU-funded GENDEX project, released today. Securing funding remains a challenge, with women-led firms taking six months longer to sign their first term sheet. Over the past decade, women-led companies raised 1.8 times less capital than those led by men. Even those that get funded often face less favourable terms. 

European deep tech gender inequity limits diversity of thought and stifles innovation. It’s also pouring hundreds of billions of euros in potential revenue down the drain.

Data from the GENDEX report shows that women-led deep tech companies have generated over 11% of the total value raised at non-IPO exits in the past decade — a disproportionately low figure. However, these firms account for just 0.6% of such deals, highlighting the outsized value created when women take the lead.

The ???? of EU tech

The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!

Achieving greater representation of women-led companies at the exit stage — both IPO and non-IPO — over the past decade would have unlocked an estimated €198.8bn in additional value, GENDEX found.

“This data proves we need structural change,” said Tanya Suarez, the chair at GENDEX, as well as the CEO of consultancy firm BlueSpecs and founder of tech accelerator IoT Tribe. “Not only is it needed to fairly represent women, but evidence shows a gender-balanced ecosystem delivers the best results.” 

Restricting European deep tech talent

While women make up 42% of STEM graduates in Europe, their representation drops sharply in the workforce. The GENDEX report finds that women account for just 24% of patent applicants, highlighting a talent drain that limits deep tech’s potential.

“Tapping into Europe’s diverse talent pool in the tech and investment sectors in the broadest and most effective way possible is vital if we are to capitalise fully on our many strengths in innovation,” said Stéphane Ouaki, head of department at the European Innovation Council, which funded the report.

The deep tech gender imbalance reflects broader societal gender issues. There is no quick fix — addressing it requires systemic change across education, investment, and workplace culture. 

However, GENDEX makes four key recommendations to remedy the problem. First, investors should demand that companies report on gender diversity before deploying capital. Second, more funding should be allocated to women-led teams, which have been shown to deliver better outcomes. Third, better legal and funding support is needed for women to secure IP rights. Finally, government co-investment should require gender-balanced portfolios to ensure accountability in public funding.

This year’s TNW Conference features a Women in Tech ticket. The pass provides 50% off access to the event, which takes place on June 19-20 in Amsterdam.

Source

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • SpaceX draws $89 billion in demand for its debut bond sale, one of the largest US offerings this year
  • The American dream is ‘very dead’ for young Americans, says Mrs. Dow Jones
  • Nearly 60% of TikTok videos shown to new users are AI slop, study finds
  • Apple’s design studio has lost nearly every Jony Ive-era designer. Incoming CEO John Ternus says he’ll fix it.
  • A 201-year-old mutual bank just launched an AI Center of Excellence with a startup partner

Recent Comments

    Archives

    • June 2026
    • May 2026
    • April 2026
    • March 2026
    • February 2026
    • January 2026
    • December 2025
    • September 2025
    • August 2025
    • July 2025
    • June 2025
    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • August 2024
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • August 2023
    • July 2023
    • June 2023
    • May 2023
    • April 2023
    • March 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020

    Categories

    • Uncategorized

    Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org
    ©2026 Londonchiropracter.com | Design: Newspaperly WordPress Theme